Search Free Essays
  Welcome to Search Free Essays !       HOME  |  REGISTER  |  LINKS  |  FAQ  |  FREE STUFF 
 
    CATEGORIES
  Acceptance
Arts
Business
English
Foreign
History
Medical
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Speeches
Sports
Technology
Top 25 School Sites!

    LINKS
  Top 75 Term Papers!
Free Essay Find
Essay Samples
Learn Essays
123 School Work
Doing My Homework
College Research
Personals Network
Free For Essays
Get Free Essays
Free For Term Papers
Need Free Essays
Net Essays
Essay Crawler
Thousands of Essays
My Term Papers
 
 
Search Your Paper Topic!

This is only the first few lines of this paper. If you would like to view the entire paper you need to register for free here. If you are already a member then login here.
Word Count: 1399
Featured Papers from DirectEssays
1. Bill C36: Canada
Self Incrimination and the right to privacy in a criminal proceeding.
The Fifth amendment protects a person against being incriminated by his or her own compelled testimonial communication. This protection is applicable to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. To be testimonial, a communication must itself, explicitly or implicitly relate to a factual assertion or disclose information that is the expression of the contents of an individual’s mind. Therefore, the privilege against self-incrimination is not violated by compelling a person to appear in a line-up, produce voice exemplars, hand writing samples, fingerprints, shave mustache or beard, or take blood-alcohol or breathalyzer test. The U.S. Supreme Court said: “the privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a criminal statute but like wise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a crime. But this protection must be confined to instances where the witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer…. To sustain the privilege, it need only be evident from the implications of the question, in the setting in which it is asked, that a responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be answered might be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result. The trial judge in appraising the claim must be governed as much by his personal perception of the peculiarities of the case as by the facts actually in evidence.” In other words, not only the confession to the commission of a crime is protected under the Fifth Amendment. Also protected are incriminating admissions that, while not sufficient in and of themselves to support a conviction, would provide a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute. Self incrimination and immunity are very much related given that both are protecting the individual who is providing information and/or volunteering an admission to a crime. There are 2 types of immunity that may be granted are transactional immunity and use immunity. Transactional immunity, a witness may be compelled to testify despite the privilege against self incrimination, but witness is protected from any prosecution for crimes to which his or her compelled testimony relates.
Search Your Essay Topic!

Still Can't Find What Your Looking For? Then Try a Essay Search!

  Copyright © 2002-2005 searchfreeessays.com. All rights reserved.