|
|
Interdependence and security. It is naïve to assume that interdependence on it’s own invariably minimizes the probability of conflict between states. Interdependence varies depending on the actors involved; each relationship has it’s own characteristics but all open up lines of information and dialogue that lessen the chance of strategic miscalculation. Interdependence is, however, an essentially economic form of co-operation, and does not always effect the security environment of the actors involved. Though interdependence implies a two-way flow of resources, it does not require that these flows be equal. This unequal state relationship is often magnified in states whose elites gain immensely from interdependence but whose general populace sees little benefit. The unrest generated by such a situation can genuinely increase the probability of conflict on both a domestic and international level. Post Cold War US relations with most of the world, and the global reaction to those policies, are a good example of this. The US’s dominance of the international system would mean nothing if it could not be used to gain favourable terms for it’s agreements, in all arenas.
|
